Marta Case
An Unlikely Heroine
While
reading a play, one expects to follow the protagonist on whatever journey he or
she will take. This protagonist will teach the reader something valuable about
life and in the process reveal his or her true motives for acting a certain
way. Normally the protagonist will serve as the character that the audience
will feel sympathy for. The audience might even find themselves relating to and
admiring certain innate qualities of the protagonist. Bertolt Brecht chooses to
completely destroy this mold that has been created about the main character of
plays in his work Mother Courage and Her
Children. Instead of creating a character for the audience to respect and
praise, Brecht molds his protagonist, Mother Courage, into a woman whose
motives seem to confuse everyone, including the audience.
Mother Courage becomes a parasite
to war because though she claims to hate is, she relies on it to support
herself and also her three children. Due to Courage’s desire for wealth, she
ends up caring more about that than of her children. One might begin to think
about the idea of a mother’s undying love and how normally a mother would do
anything for the good of her children. Sadly, that concept fails to flourish in
this play. Instead, Courage remains a prisoner to her lust for money, which
eventually leads to the demise of her children and her inability to truly feel
sorrow for their deaths. As each child dies, Courage refuses to change her
actions. One might think that Courage would realize that something needed to
change after the death of her first child. Unfortunately for the other two
children, Courage continues to act the same as she had before. There is no
doubt that Courage does love her children; but she does not fight for them with
everything inside her, as most mothers would.
Brecht chooses to create his
protagonist this way in order to send a message to the audience. He wanted to
prove that simply having children does not make a woman a mother. Instead, a
woman’s devotion to her children above all else and her willingness to perform
an array of tasks in order to help them, make a mother. From the moment Courage
was faced with one of her child’s death, it was clear that she did not react in
the same way one might think a mother should. Courage did become sad over the
death of her child, but she was not devastated and torn apart over the fact.
This action automatically turns many readers off to Courage. How could a reader
possibly respect and honor a protagonist who does not seem to value her own
children as much as she should?
I understand that Brecht was trying
to make a point by creating this unlikely protagonist, but I refuse to
sympathize with someone who seemed less affected by her children’s deaths than
she should have been. What holds me back from feeling compassion for Courage is
my own fear, which is justified. As I dig deeper into the play, I become afraid
that if this woman were my mother, she would feel the same about my death that
she did about her own children’s deaths. It hurts to think that my mother would
not be devastated over losing me, especially at a young age. Brecht achieved his
goal of presenting a controversial idea of a role so many people know and love.
The role of a mother should not be taken lightly, because each mother has more
influence and power in the lives of her children than she might realize.
No comments:
Post a Comment