Layne Bolden
Oftentimes
when a work of art or literature deviates from the established conventions of
the genre, the creator does so purposefully to create a specific reaction in
the audience. In drama, such conventions include interconnected scenes,
chronology, and sympathetic and relatable, if not likeable, characters. Many
audiences and casual readers would agree that a play should flow cohesively
and, most of all, make us sympathetic to the plight of the characters. Mother Courage and Her Children
challenges this conception because it doesn’t have a precise, linear story, but
rather provides its audience with vignettes of the characters’ lives. In turn,
this is simply one of the techniques Brecht employs to lessen our sympathy for
the cruel, capitalist Mother Courage.
Reading
Mother Courage feels different from
reading a traditional play, even at first glance. Rather than composing his
play with acts divided into scenes that more or less flow into one another,
Brecht chooses a different route. His play is made up of a series of longer
scenes that do not precisely connect. Though they each involve the title
characters in some way, side characters appear and disappear from these scenes
without much explanation. Character such as Yvette who are present in one scene
do not appear again, with no explanation, which would very likely be given in a
more traditional play. Additionally, this format results in the lack of
developed sup-plots that are often utilized in traditional plays to make them
feel richer and more fleshed out. For example, Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream feels more
real and exciting because of the numerous, interconnecting subplots, while the
few subplots in Mother Courage do not
last much longer than a scene. However, instead of making the play feel
incomplete and fragmented, this technique simply emphasizes the transitory life
that Mother Courage and her family are forced to live during wartime.
Perhaps
the most significant impact of this choice, though, is the one it has on the
audience’s view of the main characters. Though reactions to characters are
certainly unique to every person, it is fairly obvious that the lack of direct
chronology between scenes makes it harder to relate to the characters. Brecht
presents the story in such a way that the audience only receives photographs of
the characters’ lives as opposed to an entire movie. Instead of showing minute
details about a story spanning a short period of time, Mother Courage gives a broad picture of a longer story. The
audience only sees the parts of the characters’ lives that the author wants
them to see, specifically in regards to Mother Courage. Undoubtedly, Brecht
intends for the audience to dislike his protagonist, who he portrays as selfish
and unfeeling, even toward her own children. Throughout the scenes, Mother
Courage has few, if any at all, redeeming moments. Brecht’s use of
vignette-style scenes, then, is purposeful because it facilitates this. By portraying
the life of Mother Courage in a broad way, the audience only sees the pivotal
and cruel things she does, and eventually the repercussions. The audience does
not watch her develop; they only see the results, leaving little opportunity to
mourn for what has been lost.
Brecht
likely chose his scene structure in order to cover a large amount of time, but
he also made use of this stylistic choice in a larger way. The broad, almost
disconnected scenes help to put the audience at a distance from characters such
as Mother Courage, who is supposed to be hated. Through his choice of scene
structure, Brecht subtly creates an atmosphere in which audiences are less
likely to support Mother Courage, and instead feel disconnected enough to judge
her for who she really is.
No comments:
Post a Comment