Blog Post 5
While plays
traditionally follow a systematic structure of characters and plot line, Mother Courage And Her Children challenges
this expectation by having the reader decipher the context of the play and the
significance of objects and characters in the story. Brecht veers away from the
norm in the sense that he questions the popular view of the audience. Typically,
in order to engage the audience, a play must involve qualities that match the
viewer’s belief system. Instead, Mother
Courage And Her Children goes against the grain and calls into question the
validity of their values in business and war. This play attempts to defy our
expectations in such way. Rather than connect with viewers on a level that they
are extremely familiar with, the author encourages the audience to give thought
to an opinion other than their own. Not only does this make the play stand out
from others during its time, it causes the audience to think and analyze the
meaning of the pay long after it has occurred. This thought provoking plot line
aids to the play’s success at defying our expectations of what a play should be
and do at this time.
The play beings
with an atypical structure; the traditional progression through time is not
apparent. The portion of the play that we have read consists of several scenes
that do not connect at first glance. Not only does this way of laying out the
scenes helps Brecht to cover large spans of time, but it also aids to the idea
that we must develop a back story for ourselves. The chronological order of
events is disrupted, provoking the audience to generate their own ideas as to
how they connect. Rather than analyze an entire play, Brecht allows us to focus
on an individual section of the play on its own.
As a reader, I
believe that this way of organizing the play may be a bit disorganized in the way that we must construct ideas for ourselves,
but then we are proven to be misguided in the end. Brecht intends for the
viewers to have an aversion to the protagonist of the play, Mother Courage, but we, as viewers, are
convinced that she must be good at the beginning. The lack of connection
throughout the play separates us from the characters, keeping them unfamiliar
and easier to dislike. We are only exposed to part of their life, which gives
the audience a sense that they do not fully know the characters and that the
play feels almost unfinished. While he does accomplish his goal of straying
away from the normal and traditional structure of a play, he does so in a way
that complicates the story like in a unfavoring way.
No comments:
Post a Comment